Spoiler Alert: These essays are ideally to be read after viewing the respective films.

Sunday, June 22, 2014

Pope Francis Excommunicates the Mafia:Theological Lessons from “The Godfather”

As though a lamb going into a lion’s den, Pope Francis journeyed to Sibari in southern Italy on the Summer Solstice of 2014 to castigate the Italian mafia, and more specifically the Ndrangheta crime group, as an example of “the adoration of evil.”  He added that “(t)hose who in their lives follow this path of evil, as mafiosi do, are not in communion with God. They are excommunicated.”[1] Presumably so too are the mafia families in other European states, and in the American states as well. As laudable as such excommunicating is, the fact that such murderous thugs have regarded themselves as Catholics, and, more generally as Christian, points to a more profound need for reform within the religion itself. In this essay, I draw on The Godfather saga to present this argument.

Under the pope's order, Michael of the fictional Corleone family would not be able to stand as godfather to his sister’s child. In the film, Michael had ordered the murder of his godson’s father, and various other such orders were being carried out even as the baptism was taking place. Doubtless many viewers came to associate the Roman Catholic Church is a “look the other way” stance even before the clerical pedophilia story reached the light of day.

Ominously for Pope Francis, Pope John Paul had been the last Roman pope to preach openly against the mob back in 1993. That pope died shortly after becoming the pontiff. As The Godfather, Part 3 suggests, that pope’s death may have been contrived by the mob eager to keep the Vatican Bank free of prying reform. Asked in an interview shortly before his trip to southern Italy about his relative lack of security, Pope Francis said that at his age he had comparatively little to lose. In his view, the members of the Mafiosi have a lot to lose in a salvific sense.

In The Godfather, Part 3, Michael goes to the Vatican to speak to a humble Cardinal who would become the pope who is murdered. During the conversation in a courtyard, the priest seizes the moment by inviting the godfather to confess his sins. “I always have time to save souls,” the cleric offers. “What is the point of confessing if I don’t repent,” the mobster replies. “What have you got to lose?” the priest counters. Finally, Michael confesses to having given the order to kill his elder brother. Fittingly, the camera shows a solid pillar of stone between the humble religious man and the man guilty of fratricide, and the flowers may portend both the hope extended by the priest and the death of the other man’s soul.

The formal words absolution, said in authoritative-sounding Latin, is belied by what the priest himself says to Michael. “Your sins and terrible, and it is just that you suffer; your life could be redeemed, but I know that you don’t believe that; you will not change.”  Before the confession, the Cardinal had bemoaned the lack of progress that Christianity had made in Europe. Breaking open a small stone that had been in a small fountain, the red-clad cleric likened the still-dry inside of the stone to Europe, which had been immersed in Christianity for centuries yet little had so far penetrated. So too, the godfather, like his father before him, had gone through rituals in Church yet the principles and values preached and lived out by Jesus had not penetrated those two souls. Even popes have contravened even well-known principles, as for instance the four who promised salvation to Christians willing to fight in the Crusades instead of loving the enemy, turning the other cheek, and offering even more to those who take.  

Even though excommunicating members of the Mafiosi is entirely appropriate and fitting, at least as long as they refuse to change, the religion’s own pliability is itself a problem in need of an audacious leader willing to speak truth to power, or dogma in this case. Jesus says in the Gospels that he came to preach on the mysteries of the Kingdom of God, yet even early Church leaders such as the Apostles have relegated those principles in favor of attention on Christology as being the religion’s litmus test.  

Clearly, daylight between valuing the principles and believing the Creedal identity claim shows what must be a rather loose coupling; for a Christian can act in ways that contradict the deemphasized teachings without much fear of charges of hypocrisy as long as the Christological belief is correct. I submit that precisely this fault-line running through the history of Christianity is largely responsible for the fact that the religion has not penetrated Europe in spite of a presence there for almost two millennia. The “wriggle room” that exists between a cognitive assent to an identity claim and valuing principles advocated by Jesus has also made it possible for the Mafiosi members to regard themselves as Christians in spite of violently contravening the principles and values of the Kingdom of God. 

In The Godfather, Michael gives his cognitive assent during the baptism ritual to the existence of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, even as his murderous orders are being carried out antithetical to Jesus’s principle of loving one’s enemy. Had the latter received such creedal treatment from the outset in historical Christianity, perhaps Pope Francis’s announcement of excommunication in 2014 would have been preceded by many others directed against those who harass, threaten, and murder for a living.




[1] Reuters, “Pope Excommunicates Mafiosi,” The Huffington Post, June 21, 2014.